original article https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/10/16/21519370/joni-ernst-soybeans-iowa-senate-greenfield
Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, a Republican, is in for a tough reelection fight against Democratic challenger Theresa Greenfield, and a debate misstep Thursday night could hurt her. | Michael Reynolds/Getty Images
How a debate misstep could impact a hotly contested Senate race.
In the middle of an unexpectedly close reelection fight, Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst could have used a strong night at a virtual debate Thursday against Democratic challenger Theresa Greenfield. Instead, she bungled a question that her opponent said an Iowa senator should know the answer to.
It started when Greenfield correctly answered a question about the “break-even” price of corn — it’s going for about $3.68 per bushel, she said, and at that price, there might be some farmers who are meeting their production costs. Then the moderator asked Ernst a similar question about the break-even price of soybeans. Ernst answered $5.50, well below the actual price of $10.05. She then complained to the moderator that Greenfield had not been posed the same question.
Greenfield immediately seized on the moment, tweeting that Ernst “should know the price of soybeans.”
— Theresa Greenfield (@GreenfieldIowa) October 16, 2020
The question may have seemed gimmicky to some, but as NBC News political correspondent Sahil Kapur noted, familiarity with local agricultural concerns has been important to Iowa voters in the past. And six years after winning an eight-point victory to secure her first term in the US Senate, Ernst — once viewed as a rising star in the Republican Party — needs those voters.
The corn/soybeans thing was a gotcha but it calls to mind that Joni Ernst is a senator in part because her last opponent sounded tone deaf to Iowa farmers. pic.twitter.com/A0wVM6xc4P
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) October 16, 2020
Both Ernst and Greenfield grew up on farms. Ernst spent 22 years in the Iowa Army National Guard and served in the Iowa State Senate from 2011 to 2014 before being elected to the US Senate, replacing retiring Sen. Tom Harkin.
Greenfield, meanwhile, has never held elected office. After putting herself through college, she has worked as an urban planner and real estate developer in Iowa. But she’s been polling neck-and-neck with the incumbent Ernst, sometimes even a few points ahead.
Iowa has been a bellwether state in recent presidential elections. Barack Obama won the Hawkeye State by nearly 10 percentage points in 2008 and by around 6 points in 2012. But Donald Trump coasted to victory there in 2016, winning by over 9 percentage points.
Democrats, however, appear to have some momentum there now. Before the 2018 midterm elections, Republicans held three of the four US House seats in Iowa, but two of those changed hands in the last cycle. Abby Finkenauer flipped the First District, which covers the northeastern part of the state and includes Cedar Rapids, and Cindy Axne did the same in the Third District, which covers the southwestern part of the state and the capital city of Des Moines.
As Vox’s Dylan Scott explained, Iowa, which is 91 percent white, appeared to be moving permanently to the right after Republican success there in 2014 and 2016. But the more urban and suburban parts of Iowa are growing, which could pose problems for both Ernst and Trump. And Thursday didn’t help. As one Democratic strategist had previously told Scott:
“The thing people like about Joni Ernst, she was real and relatable,” the Democratic strategist said. “Greenfield has that in spades. … Voters want to vote for somebody they think understands the life they’re leading.”
The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election: Contribute today from as little as $3.